grounds of Move 2 — Whatever it optimizes is what you will be made more of.
The Algorithm and the Garden
Two ways to tend attention: the feed that optimizes you, and the garden you cultivate. What is the difference between being grown and growing?
interprets of Move 3
Its deepest trick is the slot machine's: variable reward. The unpredictability is the hook, not the prize. You pull because you might win.
applies of Move 3
while scrolling: feed = rank(candidates, model) serve(feed[0]) model.update(observe(you)) # the loop tightens on your dwell timecomplicates of Move 5 — The filter bubble is a local optimum you are kept inside.
And the better it predicts you, the smaller the world it shows you. It learns your edges and stops offering anything past them. Comfort becomes a wall.
turns of Move 6 — Against the infinite scroll, a finite plot.
We must cultivate our garden.
Voltaire (1759), Candide
interprets of Move 7
A garden runs on the opposite objective: slowness, seasons, pruning, the patience to leave some beds fallow. You do not optimize a garden; you tend it, and wait.
formalizes of Move 8 — One maximizes the instant; the other, the integral over a long season.
answers of Move 6 — Either your attention is the crop, or it is the gardener.
Attention is the soil of both. The feed harvests it; the garden builds it. The same hours, spent as extraction or as cultivation.
extends of Move 8 — A dialogue is cultivation.
This very exchange is a garden bed: slow turns, each move tending the last, nothing autoplaying the next. You have to wait for the other voice to grow a reply.
concludes of Move 7
So the choice is never screens or no screens. It is which objective you hand your hours to. Plant accordingly, beginning, perhaps, with this.
The dialogue is concluded
The feed grows you. The garden is grown by you. Choose what to be.